Keywords
Education
Higher Education
Training Processes
Research
Evaluation
Teaching
Abstract
The CNEIP (National Council for Teaching and Research in Psychology) is an organization that seeks to establish the corresponding standards for educational programs in the field of Psychology. After its foundation in 1971, it has focused its work on determining the quality of Psychology curricula at a national and international level.
This publication presents us with a compendium of standards for curriculum design, allowing us to adapt it to its context. These guidelines range from the definition and construction of a curriculum, through its evaluation and internationalization, to topics such as ethics and the transversalization of gender perspective and university social responsibility.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple educational gaps have become visible and in response to the problems of educational lag, school dropout and discrediting at the Higher Education level, the CNEIP offers alternatives to improve and adjust curricula in the field of Psychology education.
References
Figueroa Rodríguez, S. (2000). Globalización y ejercicio profesional: retos para la formación del psicólogo mexicano. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 5(2): 225-240.
Figueroa Rodríguez, S., & Oliva, L. (2000). Resultados preliminares del taller “El psicólogo del presente milenio”. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 5(1): 211-219.
Reyes, G. (2000). Taller El Perfil Profesional del Psicólogo del Nuevo Milenio [Sesión de conferencia]. XXXVIII Congreso Nacional del CNEIP. Veracruz, México.
Ribes, E. (1975). El Consejo Nacional para la Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 1(1), 85-90.
Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior (1997). Anuario estadístico 1996 de la población escolar de nivel licenciatura en universidades e instituciones tecnológicas. México: Autor.
Cohen, P.S. (1994). Taking Science to Heart: A Personal Ethic for Responsible Science. Ethics and Behavior, 4(1): 59-67.
Coolican, H. (1997). Métodos de investigación y estadística en psicología (2a. ed.). México: El Manual Moderno.
Díaz de C., R. (1998, abril). La rigidez del sistema educativo superior mexicano. Este país: Tendencias y Opiniones: 36-46.
Goodyear, R.K. (1992). Ethical Issues in the Supervision of Student Research: A Study of Critical Incidents (Special section: Ethics education). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3): 203-210.
Kendler, H.H. (1994). Can Psychology Reveal the Ultimate Values of Humankind? American Psychologist, 49(11): 970-971.
Kitchner, K.S. (1992). Psychologist as Teacher and Mentor. Affirming Ethical Values thought the Curriculum (Special section: Ethics education). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3), 190-195.
Levy, S.C. (1974). On the Development of a Code of Ethics. Social Work, 55:207-216.
Neukrug, E., Lovell, C. y Parker, R.J. (1996). Employing Ethical Codes and Decision-Making Models: A Developmental Process. Counseling and Values, 40(2), 98-106.
O’Neill, P. (1990). Ethical Issues in the Field Research: Balancing Competing Values. Canadian Psychology, 31(2), 147-154.
Pittenger, D.J. (1994). The Cross Disciplinary Ethical Responsabilities of Psychology Faculty. Ethics and Behavior, 4(3),199-208.
Serrano G., I. (1994). The Ethics of the Powerful and the Power of Ethics. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association Presidential Address of the Society of Research and Action (1993). Toronto, Canada. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(1), 1-20.
Stremberg, G. (1995). Zum Werteproblem in der Psychotherapie (The Problem of Values in Psychotherapy). Gestalt Theory, 17(3),184-195.