ISSN-e: 2007-4778
.PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

Neocolonialism
Patriarchy
Patriacene
Realistic
Liberal and Cosmopolitan Peace
Covid-19 Pandemic
Russian-Ukrainian War
Sustainable-Engendered Peace
Care Economy

Abstract

Feminist Peace in Times of War, Pandemic, and Climate Change
Úrsula Oswald-Spring, CRIM-UNAM


Realist, liberal, and cosmopolitan theories of peace predominant in a globalized world, did not question the patriarchal models of the economy that have destroyed the welfare of the people and the planet by the Patriacene. Transnational corporations have promoted extractive wars in the Global South and the NATO military-corporate-scientific-financial complex has produced a realistic response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. It has expanded the theater of war into Asia and produced millions of refugees, deaths, and injuries on both sides. Globally, it has induced higher price inflation in food, energy, and services. This article explores a sustainable-engendered and decolonized peace from below to counter patriarchal violence and generate prosperity and environmental recovery. Care work, primarily in the hands of women and indigenous peoples, has sustained communities and recovered the environment. It prevents and peacefully negotiates conflicts, promotes living well, and protects Mother Earth from the impacts of climate change.

 

Keywords: Neocolonialism; Patriarchy; Patriacene; Realistic; Liberal and Cosmopolitan Peace; Covid-19 Pandemic; Russian-Ukrainian War; Sustainable-Engendered Peace; Care Economy

.PDF (Spanish)

References

Acharya, A. (2014). The End of the American World Order. Cambridge, Policy Press.

Bellinger III, J.B. (2022). “How Russia’s attack on Ukraine violates international law”, Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/how-russias-attack-on-ukraine-violates-international-law.

Calva, José Luis (2024). Políticas y Derechos Sociales, vol 12. CDMX: Consejo Nacional Universitarios y Fontamara.

D’Eaubonne, Françoise (1974). Le Féminisme ou la Mort, Paris: Pierre Horay.

Engels, Friedrich (1884). Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privatigentums und des Staates, Zürich: Hottingen.

Falk, Richard (1999). Predatory Globalization. A Chritique. Cambridge: Polity.

Galtung, Johan (1967). “Peace research: science or politics in disguise”, International spectator 21(19): 1573-1603.

Hartsock, Nancy C.M. (1988). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, Westview Press.

International Crisis Group (2025). 10 conflictos para tener en la mira en 2025, https://www.crisisgroup.org/es/global/10-conflicts-watch-2025.

Kahrić, Adla, Kulijer Dejan, Dedić Neira, Šnjegota Dragana (2022). Integrated Approach to 21st Century Challenges to Health: Degradation of ecosystemns and los of ecosystem services, One Health (9): 282-327

Lagarde, M. 1990. Los Cautiverios de las Mujeres. Madresposas, Monjas, Putas, Presas y Locas. CDMX: CEIICH-UNAM.

Meinderts, Tom (2020). Intermestic Realism: Domestic Considerations in International Relations, E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2020/03/24/intermestic-realism-domestic-considerations-in-international-relations/#google_vignette.

Newell, Sacha (2012). The Modernity Bluff: Crime, Consumption, and Citizenship in Côte D’Ivoire, Chigago:The Chicago University Press.

ONU (2024a). Informes de la ONU sobre el genocidio de palestinos en Gaza: 70% son mujeres y niños, https://idehpucp.pucp.edu.pe/boletin-eventos/informes-de-la-onu-sobre-el-genocidio-de-palestinos-en-gaza-70-son-mujeres-y-ninos/.

Paz, José G. (2019) ¿Cómo se llegó a la Segunda Guerra Mundial?, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Edicion-Hispanoamericana/Archivos/Cuarto-Trimestre-2019/Como-se-llego-a-la-Segunda-Guerra-Mundial/

Piketty, Thomas (2014). El Capital en el Siglo XXI. Buenos Aires: FCE.

Ravenhill, J. y Jiang, Y. (2009). “China’s Move to Preferential Trading: a new direction in China’s diplomacy”. Journal of Contemporary China, 58(18), 27-46.

San Martín (2018). La guerra híbrida rusa sobre Occidente, Nueva York: Page Publishing, Kindle Edition.

Toscano López, D. (2016). El poder en Foucault: ‘Un caleidoscopio magnífico’, Logos 26(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.15443/RL2608.

UNESCO (2000). For a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence. Manifiesto. París: UNESCO.

Vaughan, Genevieve (2004). The Gift; Il Dono. Roma, Meltemi, New Series 8, Universidad de Bari.

Waever, Olé (1997). Concepts of Security, Copenhagen: Departmento de Ciencias Políticas.

Zibechi, Raul (2006). “El zapatismo y América Latina. La otra y nosotros”, Contrahistorias. La otra mirada de Clío, No. 6 (March-August): 57-72.

Los/as autores/as pueden mantener el copyright, concediendo a la revista el derecho de primera publicación. Alternativamente, las/os autoras/es pueden transferir el copyright a la revista, la cual permitirá a las/os autoras/es el uso no-comercial del trabajo, incluyendo el derecho a colocarlo en un archivo de acceso libre. Además, se puede consultar Creative Commons sobre licencias de copyright flexibles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.